Our way of being erected is a kind of calling card that declares who we are, what are our conditions and our way of life. Louder than words posture says about us and our history. It 'hard to take a certain attitude, if there is no personal relationship with the emotional reality: in fact the body has a remarkable sincerity and say what you would like to keep quiet. It 'also difficult to recruit a fully erect posture when there is nothing that can support it in our functional integrity, the quality of our way of moving.
The capacity of the star's back straight depends on the ability to bend without harm us, when necessary, or turn your head, or the way we breathe while practicing a sport, by the reaction of the knees when you jump from what happens in the muscles of the body in any action daily.
artificially constructed an upright posture means to make it even more obvious that our fiction. The posture is consistent with the mental and physical ecology.
There is a profound difference between East and West approach to the correction: In the West when you are not satisfied with their posture we often hear that we should do something to improve. In the East
instead you think that nature knows how to find the organization ideal. What ruins it is that something extra that we've added us too much food, too much noise, and more. The West urges us to act. The East advises us to understand and improve ourselves. E 'possible to combine both approaches without contradicting? What is this intervention in more than boycott the ideal posture?
Many complain of their posture, few are complaining instead of moving without providing adequate and effective responses. The posture is seen as a kind of photograph, frozen in time, separated from the flow of life.
We want to have a posture just as ideal as they are our capacity for social communication, our family relationships, our working competence, creativity, ability to enjoy the efficiency of our answers in every area of \u200b\u200blife.
worry only about our posture without considering what it expresses is how to give importance to one side only, continues to struggle with the difficulties of life instead of trying to improve our self.
There is a close relationship between the attitude and quality of body movement that it provides the organism.
What is the logic of a reluctant body to an upright posture if Nature had intended that it did? Star rights to what end? The ideal posture is perhaps only one standing, motionless, symmetric with respect to a central axis? Life is not static, flowing and constantly changing: the only constant is change. Our posture can be compared in its essence a fountain that changes appearance to the changing conditions that feed it. When we talk about body language change really begin to look for alignment in dynamic terms, making us aware of the qualities that create it and the process that powers it. Taking care of static product only brings frustration and a struggle without end.
In terms of dynamic posture is the starting point of every action. A posture is good when it allows us to move with minimal effort and is the organic instinct to organize this in view of the posture.
Each body is created with the knowledge of how to organize in order to pass from one state to another with minimal investment, then easily return to neutral position.
functional posture is not a pattern of alignments and angles, even if it may appear, but the expression of the guidance, organizational capacity that allows us to initiate any activity with the minimal energy consumption and minimal waste time in the preparatory phase.
If we lost this ability to be open to life, if we lost the ability to adapt to new challenges and we have limited the variety of our responses in the organization of our movements, even the vertical posture and property will be inadequate.
aspire to achieve a balance in various postures and configurations temporary does not preclude the ability to give that balance to make other changes and then return to the stable posture in a new form.
In other words, our stability is that insofar as we have the ability to risk losing it, relying on the possibility of finding, although in different forms.
Our stability is good insofar as we would like to demolish it and build another in its place.
Our posture is good insofar as we have a culture that motor struggles to find the easiest and most efficient.
conclude with a question, hoping to intrigue the reader: how do you schedule a task that is conducive to keeping your back straight? How can I determine a situation in which the body feels in itself the need to be right without charges?
will be the subject of which I'll discuss shortly.
Anna Torreggiani: dojo student of Eleanor, a graduate of Physical Education and teacher of the Feldenkrais Method ®
The capacity of the star's back straight depends on the ability to bend without harm us, when necessary, or turn your head, or the way we breathe while practicing a sport, by the reaction of the knees when you jump from what happens in the muscles of the body in any action daily.
artificially constructed an upright posture means to make it even more obvious that our fiction. The posture is consistent with the mental and physical ecology.
There is a profound difference between East and West approach to the correction: In the West when you are not satisfied with their posture we often hear that we should do something to improve. In the East
instead you think that nature knows how to find the organization ideal. What ruins it is that something extra that we've added us too much food, too much noise, and more. The West urges us to act. The East advises us to understand and improve ourselves. E 'possible to combine both approaches without contradicting? What is this intervention in more than boycott the ideal posture?
Many complain of their posture, few are complaining instead of moving without providing adequate and effective responses. The posture is seen as a kind of photograph, frozen in time, separated from the flow of life.
We want to have a posture just as ideal as they are our capacity for social communication, our family relationships, our working competence, creativity, ability to enjoy the efficiency of our answers in every area of \u200b\u200blife.
worry only about our posture without considering what it expresses is how to give importance to one side only, continues to struggle with the difficulties of life instead of trying to improve our self.
There is a close relationship between the attitude and quality of body movement that it provides the organism.
What is the logic of a reluctant body to an upright posture if Nature had intended that it did? Star rights to what end? The ideal posture is perhaps only one standing, motionless, symmetric with respect to a central axis? Life is not static, flowing and constantly changing: the only constant is change. Our posture can be compared in its essence a fountain that changes appearance to the changing conditions that feed it. When we talk about body language change really begin to look for alignment in dynamic terms, making us aware of the qualities that create it and the process that powers it. Taking care of static product only brings frustration and a struggle without end.
In terms of dynamic posture is the starting point of every action. A posture is good when it allows us to move with minimal effort and is the organic instinct to organize this in view of the posture.
Each body is created with the knowledge of how to organize in order to pass from one state to another with minimal investment, then easily return to neutral position.
functional posture is not a pattern of alignments and angles, even if it may appear, but the expression of the guidance, organizational capacity that allows us to initiate any activity with the minimal energy consumption and minimal waste time in the preparatory phase.
If we lost this ability to be open to life, if we lost the ability to adapt to new challenges and we have limited the variety of our responses in the organization of our movements, even the vertical posture and property will be inadequate.
aspire to achieve a balance in various postures and configurations temporary does not preclude the ability to give that balance to make other changes and then return to the stable posture in a new form.
In other words, our stability is that insofar as we have the ability to risk losing it, relying on the possibility of finding, although in different forms.
Our stability is good insofar as we would like to demolish it and build another in its place.
Our posture is good insofar as we have a culture that motor struggles to find the easiest and most efficient.
conclude with a question, hoping to intrigue the reader: how do you schedule a task that is conducive to keeping your back straight? How can I determine a situation in which the body feels in itself the need to be right without charges?
will be the subject of which I'll discuss shortly.
Anna Torreggiani: dojo student of Eleanor, a graduate of Physical Education and teacher of the Feldenkrais Method ®
